<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Lombard &#38; Geliebter, LLP - The Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blogtrademark.com/?feed=rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blogtrademark.com</link>
	<description>Trademark Law: News, Tips, &#38; Developments</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 01:37:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Sanofi-Aventis Rumored to Make Offer for Genzyme</title>
		<link>http://www.blogtrademark.com/?p=834</link>
		<comments>http://www.blogtrademark.com/?p=834#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 01:37:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>G. Mathew Lombard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Trademarks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogtrademark.com/?p=834</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to The New York Times&#8230;
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/24/business/24drug.html?src=busln"><em>The</em> <em>New York Times</em></a>&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blogtrademark.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=834</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>He&#8217;s Baaaaaaccccckkkk!</title>
		<link>http://www.blogtrademark.com/?p=833</link>
		<comments>http://www.blogtrademark.com/?p=833#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 01:17:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>G. Mathew Lombard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Trademarks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogtrademark.com/?p=833</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Leo Stoller, that is.&#160; We posted about him in January 2007, here.&#160; In a nutshell, Mr. Stoller has been repeatedly admonished – and sanctioned &#8211; by the U.S. Patent &#38; Trademark Office for his behavior.
Well, it seems that, in some form, Mr. Stoller is back.&#160; 
Here’s one specimen he filed:
 
&#160;
Here’s a second:
 

Is he [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Leo Stoller, that is.&#160; We posted about him in January 2007, <a href="http://www.blogtrademark.com/?p=190" target="_blank">here</a>.&#160; In a nutshell, Mr. Stoller has been repeatedly admonished – and sanctioned &#8211; by the U.S. Patent &amp; Trademark Office for his behavior.</p>
<p>Well, it seems that, in some form, <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100719/02130110270.shtml" target="_blank">Mr. Stoller is back</a>.&#160; </p>
<p>Here’s one specimen he filed:</p>
<p><img style="display: block; float: none; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto" src="http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4114/4807617135_147efcabe6.jpg" width="108" height="108" /> </p>
<p>&#160;</p>
<p>Here’s a second:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.blogtrademark.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/bball.png"><img style="border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; display: block; float: none; margin-left: auto; border-top: 0px; margin-right: auto; border-right: 0px" title="bball" border="0" alt="bball" src="http://www.blogtrademark.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/bball_thumb.png" width="107" height="108" /></a> </p>
</p>
<p>Is he kidding?</p>
<p>With regard to the basketball “specimen,” we located 49 occurrences of the same image (minus “STEALTH” and “NBA”) (using <a href="http://www.tineye.com/" target="_blank">TinEye</a>).&#160; We’re not sure how long the results page will remain active, but you can check out the results <a href="http://www.tineye.com/search/0ee7eadf503a774e249bc1a4df0feb8c3267b0aa/" target="_blank">here</a>.&#160; Fraud on the USPTO?&#160; We think so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blogtrademark.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=833</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Online companies get a bye on using trademarks</title>
		<link>http://www.blogtrademark.com/?p=830</link>
		<comments>http://www.blogtrademark.com/?p=830#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 13:11:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Darren M. Geliebter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Trademarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2nd Circuit Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contributory trademark infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intellectual property law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keywords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online trademark infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogtrademark.com/?p=830</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good article summarizing the latest round of prominent cases in the U.S. and the EU addressing online companies&#8217; liability for trademark infringement of their users: http://bit.ly/cbbH37 d
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good article summarizing the latest round of prominent cases in the U.S. and the EU addressing online companies&#8217; liability for trademark infringement of their users: http://bit.ly/cbbH37 d</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blogtrademark.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=830</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Counterfeit Goes Prime Time</title>
		<link>http://www.blogtrademark.com/?p=823</link>
		<comments>http://www.blogtrademark.com/?p=823#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 12:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>G. Mathew Lombard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Trademarks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogtrademark.com/?p=823</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tonight CNBC will premiere its show Crime Inc.:  Counterfeit Goods tonight, July 14 at 9 PM.  From the CNBC web site:
Fake handbags, watches, shoes and perfumes. The business of Counterfeit Goods is the largest underground industry in the world. Hundreds of billions of dollars are generated while sapping the economy, putting lives in jeopardy, and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.blogtrademark.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/crimeinc.gif"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-824" title="crimeinc" src="http://www.blogtrademark.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/crimeinc.gif" alt="" width="103" height="60" /></a>Tonight CNBC will premiere its show <a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/37824347/"><strong>Crime Inc.:  Counterfeit Goods</strong></a> tonight, July 14 at 9 PM.  From the CNBC web site:</p>
<blockquote><p>Fake handbags, watches, shoes and perfumes. The business of Counterfeit Goods is the largest underground industry in the world. Hundreds of billions of dollars are generated while sapping the economy, putting lives in jeopardy, and funding organized crime in the process.<br />
CNBC’s &#8220;<em>Crime Inc.: Counterfeit Goods</em>,&#8221; takes viewers on a rare look inside a global crime spree, where the goods are produced and confiscated in a world of high-risk and high-reward.<br />
Host <a href="/id/15837990/">Carl Quintanilla</a> takes you on raids with the LAPD anti-counterfeiting unit, inspections at ports, and back-room factories where counterfeits are produced. Meet a company whose whole brand was copied, and the story of a defense contractor who counterfeit defense parts that found their way into weapons depots in Iraq.<br />
At around 7% of all global trade, Counterfeit Goods are a big business with low overhead. It makes too much money to go away any time soon.</p></blockquote>
<p>You can also view a <a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/37824359">slideshow</a> of the Top 10 seized goods.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blogtrademark.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=823</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bastille Day</title>
		<link>http://www.blogtrademark.com/?p=822</link>
		<comments>http://www.blogtrademark.com/?p=822#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 03:01:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>G. Mathew Lombard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Announcements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogtrademark.com/?p=822</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[À nos clients et collègues français, nous vous souhaitons un joyeux Quatorze Juillet !
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size:16pt">À nos clients et collègues français, nous vous souhaitons un joyeux Quatorze Juillet !</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blogtrademark.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=822</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Virtual Infringement</title>
		<link>http://www.blogtrademark.com/?p=814</link>
		<comments>http://www.blogtrademark.com/?p=814#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2010 16:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>G. Mathew Lombard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Trademarks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogtrademark.com/?p=814</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For a discussion of trademark infringement in virtual realities (like Second Life), see here.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For a discussion of trademark infringement in virtual realities (like Second Life), see <a href="http://www.worldtrademarkreview.com/daily/detail.aspx?g=6F7E9886-3A5F-4783-A028-320B8518FD5A" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blogtrademark.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=814</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>EU Court Rules That Adwords Do Not Infringe Trademark Laws</title>
		<link>http://www.blogtrademark.com/?p=819</link>
		<comments>http://www.blogtrademark.com/?p=819#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 20:48:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Darren M. Geliebter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Trademarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adwords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CTM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keywords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogtrademark.com/?p=819</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ 
EU Court Rules That Adwords Do  Not Infringe Trademark Laws: http://shar.es/mF7Dz
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><a id="status_star_18146246664" title="favorite  this tweet"> </a></div>
<p>EU Court Rules That Adwords Do  Not Infringe Trademark Laws:<a rel="nofollow" href="http://shar.es/mF7Dz" target="_blank"> http://shar.es/mF7Dz</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blogtrademark.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=819</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tenuous Contributory Infringement Claim Allowed</title>
		<link>http://www.blogtrademark.com/?p=813</link>
		<comments>http://www.blogtrademark.com/?p=813#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 16:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>G. Mathew Lombard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Trademarks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogtrademark.com/?p=813</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Judge Baer of the Southern District of New York has allowed Gucci to proceed with contributory infringement claims against credit card processing companies that processed purchases for web site selling counterfeit Gucci products.
Judge Baer concluded that there was insufficient evidence to support direct trademark infringement, but sufficient evidence to support contributory trademark infringement.&#160; Specifically, the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Judge Baer of the Southern District of New York has allowed Gucci to proceed with <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100627/1124369974.shtml" target="_blank">contributory infringement claims against credit card processing companies</a> that processed purchases for web site selling counterfeit Gucci products.</p>
<p>Judge Baer concluded that there was insufficient evidence to support direct trademark infringement, but sufficient evidence to support contributory trademark infringement.&#160; Specifically, the court noted that the middleman who set up the merchant account actually advertised on its website that it worked with “high risk merchants” including those who sold “replicas.”</p>
<p>We are unsure about the wisdom of this decision.&#160; We anticipate an appeal.&#160; Third party liability is a tricky beast since it essentially imposes liability for <em>knowledge</em> rather than <em>conduct</em>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blogtrademark.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=813</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pharmaceutical Trademark Law: Some Tips &amp; Considerations To Keep In Mind</title>
		<link>http://www.blogtrademark.com/?p=815</link>
		<comments>http://www.blogtrademark.com/?p=815#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 21:16:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Darren M. Geliebter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Pharmaceuticals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trademarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPTO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EMEA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pharmaceutical trademark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark regitration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogtrademark.com/?p=815</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clearing and obtaining rights to pharmaceutical trademarks presents unique challenges unlike those associated with trademarks used in other fields. In addition to navigating the U.S. Patent &#38; Trademark Office, the pharmaceutical trademark lawyer must counsel his or her client regarding the FDA regulatory hurdles that go along with securing a chosen product name.  After all, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clearing and obtaining rights to pharmaceutical trademarks presents unique challenges unlike those associated with trademarks used in other fields. In addition to navigating the U.S. Patent &amp; Trademark Office, the pharmaceutical trademark lawyer must counsel his or her client regarding the FDA regulatory hurdles that go along with securing a chosen product name.  After all, it does the client no good to successfully secure a Notice of Allowance if the FDA ultimately rejects the trademark during its drug name review process.  And the FDA gives no deference to U.S. Patent &amp; Trademark Office decisions on registrability of trademarks. This is why it is critical to be mindful of both the U.S. Patent &amp; Trademark Office&#8217;s approach and the FDA&#8217;s approach to approving chosen pharmaceutical trademarks.</p>
<p>Here are some quick points and tips (not by any means an exhaustive list) to keep in mind as you navigate the pharmaceutical trademark minefield:</p>
<ul>
<li>You may submit up to two trademark names at a time to the FDA for approval, a process which takes approximately 3 years</li>
<li>Be careful about names that imply efficacy, risk, indication, superiority, or that are overly fanciful</li>
<li>Handwriting Analysis: Be mindful of potential confusing similarity between trademarks when they are handwritten, even if they are otherwise visually different when typewritten, or phonetically different; we all know that doctors are not known for having the best penmanship!</li>
<li>Verbal pronunciation analysis: even if 2 respective trademarks are visually distinguishable, if they sound the same when spoken verbally, this will weigh against ultimate approval</li>
<li>You may very well need to consider the trademark registration process and drug approval process in a foreign country if the product will be marketed and sold internationally; for example, the regulatory agency for the evaluation of medicinal products  in the European Union is EMEA (European Medicines Agency).  EMEA has its own process and rejects approximately 50% of proposed trademark names</li>
</ul>
<p>Our team here at Lombard &amp; Geliebter LLP has extensive experience representing pharmaceutical companies in connection with their trademark matters. If you have any questions relating to the pharmaceutical trademark law, please call Mathew Lombard or Darren Geliebter at 212-551-1755 or reach us by email: mail@lgtrademark.com.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blogtrademark.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=815</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FDA Approves Macular Degeneration Treatment</title>
		<link>http://www.blogtrademark.com/?p=812</link>
		<comments>http://www.blogtrademark.com/?p=812#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 04:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>G. Mathew Lombard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Trademarks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogtrademark.com/?p=812</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The FDA has approved a first-of-its-kind technology to counter a leading cause of blindness in older adults — macular degeneration.&#160; The solution:&#160; a tiny telescope implanted inside the eye.
The Implantable Miniature Telescope is intended to help at the end stages of incurable age-related macular degeneration, a slow, creeping loss of central vision that blocks reading, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The FDA has <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/38115792/ns/health-more_health_news/" target="_blank">approved a first-of-its-kind technology to counter a leading cause of blindness in older adults</a> — macular degeneration.&#160; The solution:&#160; a tiny telescope implanted inside the eye.</p>
<p>The Implantable Miniature Telescope is intended to help at the end stages of incurable age-related macular degeneration, a slow, creeping loss of central vision that blocks reading, watching TV, eventually even recognizing faces.</p>
<p>The procedure is not without risk or serious complications.&#160; However, the treatment looks promising for the right candidate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blogtrademark.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=812</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
